“Look at every path closely and deliberately, then ask ourselves this crucial question: Does this path have a heart? If it does, then the path is good. If it doesn't, it is of no use.”
~Carlos Castaneda

Pages

Friday, November 23, 2007

It is interview time again

“We tend to forget that happiness doesn't come as a result of getting something we don't have, but rather of recognizing and appreciating what we do have.”
~Frederick Keonig
It is that time of the year. All of the applications are here. We have to go through the tedious process of review resident applications for interview. It is a difficult process for our program because we actually go through all of the applications for the pre-screen. AARRRGGGHHH. I wish there was a fail-safe approach to screening applications and selecting residents. I have not found one yet.



So many people ask the question, what does it take to get into orthopaedics? I have posted before some statistic on what many programs look for in an applicant. But, my view of this is like drafting in the NFL. The statistics do not give you the intangibles. Randy Moss and Terrel Owens are great receivers; but if they are in the wrong system or with the wrong combination of players, they don't do well. And, who can forget the Ryan Leaf or Akili Smith. Then there are players that put in the right systems they flourish, Willie Parker and Tom Brady. With that prospective, I believe that there are people and programs that are a better fit. That is not to say that if you have some of the basic stats (USMLE, Grades, etc) you are or are not a shoe-in to a program. But, I do believe that there are better fits.



From the program end, what we try to do is know who we are. We understand what type of program we have an what residents do particularly well and which don't. We can look back over years and know what is our normal pattern of applications. We know what schools and states we receive a lot of applicants from and which ones we do not. This makes that application selection process different. In our program, we are not necessarily looking for some statistical wonder or the ugly duckling. What we generally prefer is a solid individual that fits what we feel is our personality profile.

From the applicant prospective, I believe that best approach to applying is to be realistic with yourself. Know what you strengths and weaknesses are (yes we all have them) . This is an important inventory but difficult to do, well. Next, you need to see where you would like to be located regionally, and look at you school's history of placing people in programs in that location. Then you should look the programs in that area and evaluate how they fit into your personality profile. This will help you in choosing the best program that will help you flourish.


In the end, most of those that obtain a residency will complete and become an orthopaedic surgeon. The more important question is will those same people have a positive experience and become the best with their abilities. My view is that not every flower will be beautiful in every soil; but, given the right soil, every flower can be beautiful.

“The reason people find it so hard to be happy is that they always see the past better than it was, the present worse than it is, and the future less resolved than it will be”
~Marcel Pagnol

5 comments:

  1. That must be a daunting task to weed through all of those. A hard thing to hold someone's hopes of getting into a program, and then making a decision on them. Good luck with the choices you make.

    ReplyDelete
  2. While I understand the process and the fact that there is a huge surplus of applicants and very little time, I think the most irritating thing to me as an applicant is to go on an interview where the interviewer has not read my application. If I can take the time to drive hours or fly half way across the country, and spend what minimal money I have on a hotel, the interviewer should be able to take 5 minutes to read my application before we meet. Instead of meeting them and getting to know each other, I spend the entire 20 minutes regurgitating what is right front of them. I think the worst is when their first question is, "Tell me about yourself." They should just be honest and say, "I didn't bother to look at your app, so sum it up for me." When someone knows who you are on paper, it facilitates the conversation so much better.

    Overall, I find this to be somewhat rude/disrespectful on the part of the program. I feel bad when they only give the interviewers the file as you are walking in the door.

    Ohh well, just had to rant.

    ReplyDelete
  3. uh,oh, hope I didn't over step...I should probably start reading law blogs instead.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Someonetc - I'm sorry, I know you are really, really busy. I was 1/2 joking with you when I left that.(although did worry a tad)Long day for you. I shouldn't tease. Hope you can get rested.

    I like the way you would answer that question. Perhaps we do tend to make it more difficult than it is.

    ReplyDelete
  5. That's a great perspective on the application process. I have to interview residents starting on Monday Dec 10. I also like the "tell me about yourself" question, because it has a reasonable chance of getting an idea of what someone's like.

    ReplyDelete